Odd-parity quasiparticle interference in the superconductive surface state of UTe2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Although no known material exhibits intrinsic topological superconductivity, where a spin-triplet electron pairing potential has odd parity, UTe 2 is now the leading candidate. Generally, the parity of a superconducting order parameter can be established using Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference imaging. However, odd-parity superconductors should support a topological quasiparticle surface band at energies within the maximum superconducting energy gap. Quasiparticle interference should then be dominated by the electronic structure of the quasiparticle surface band and only reveal the characteristics of the bulk order parameter indirectly. Here we demonstrate that at the (0–11) cleave surface of UTe 2 , a band of Bogoliubov quasiparticles appears only in the superconducting state. Performing high-resolution quasiparticle interference measurements then allows us to explore the dispersion of states in this superconductive surface band, showing that they exist only within the range of Fermi momenta projected onto the (0–11) surface. Finally, we develop a theoretical framework to predict the quasiparticle interference signatures of this surface band at the (0–11) surface. Its predictions are consistent with the experimental results if the bulk superconducting order parameter exhibits time-reversal conserving, odd-parity, a -axis nodal, B 3 u symmetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".