Determinants of Myopia Severity Based on Behavior and Genetic Factors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General Background: Myopia is a leading global vision disorder affecting quality of life and projected to impact over half the world’s population by 2050. Specific Background: Among university students, behavioral factors such as prolonged near work and gadget use, alongside genetic predisposition, are recognized contributors, yet findings remain inconsistent, particularly in public health student populations. Knowledge Gap: Limited studies have specifically identified dominant determinants of myopia severity in public health students, a group expected to champion health promotion. Aims: This study aimed to determine the behavioral and genetic factors most strongly associated with myopia severity among Public Health students at Universitas Prima Indonesia. Results: Using a cross-sectional analytic design with 74 diagnosed myopic students, multivariate logistic regression revealed significant associations with reading distance <30 cm, gadget use >3 hours/day, and family history, with genetic factors showing the highest odds ratio (AOR = 8.567, p = 0.002). Gender was not significant. Novelty: The study uniquely combines primary and secondary data, integrates multivariate analysis, and aligns findings with the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion and SDG 3. Implications: Results support campus-based preventive strategies, including visual hygiene education, gadget use reduction, and early screening for genetically at-risk students.Highlight : Genetic factors are the most dominant determinant of the degree of myopia. Hours of gadget use and close reading increase the risk of myopia. Health promotion on campus is important for preventing the progression of myopia. Keywords : Myopia, Derajat Myopia, Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat, Penggunaan Gadget, Faktor Genetik
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it