MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414339366 · doi:10.1177/11297298251376970

Tetrasodium EDTA central venous catheter lock solution in home parenteral nutrition patients: Ease of use and patient satisfaction, a prospective study

2025· article· en· W4414339366 on OpenAlexaff
Lina María Saucedo, Yasaman Ghorbani, Maria Heusser, Giulia Chagas, Celeste Arca, Katherine J. P. Schwenger, Johane P. Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Vascular Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersFresenius Kabi
KeywordsParenteral nutritionCatheterLock (firearm)Central venous catheterProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Chronic intestinal failure is a devastating chronic medical condition, which requires central venous access for parenteral nutrition infusion. The presence of a central venous line is associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection and thrombosis. Currently, the heparin lock is the most used catheter lock, but still has risks for line infection. The 4% tetrasodium EDTA catheter lock (KiteLock™) solution, has demonstrated a decrease in infection and thrombosis risk, but requires extra steps for the preparation and infusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the patients ease-of-use and acceptability of the new KiteLock solution in the home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. Methods: This prospective, open-label, single-center study evaluated patient acceptability of tetrasodium EDTA (KiteLock) in HPN. Patients were contacted four times, beginning with an instructional visit by the HPN nurse. They then completed three 30-day phases: standard heparin/saline flush, tetrasodium with withdrawal (when feasible), and tetrasodium EDTA. During the final week of each phase, patients completed a phone survey and questionnaire with the HPN nurse. Results: Of the 21 patients enrolled, 14 completed the study. Seven did not: two withdrew due to time constraints, two found KiteLock difficult to infuse, and three had incomplete data. Among those who competed the study, some reported reduced ease-of-use with KiteLock (1 hard to open, 5 difficulties withdrawing, 1 overall difficulty), though most still rated it easy or very easy. Three patients continued to find it more difficult by study end. No adverse effects were reported. Preparation time decreased over time as patients adapted. Initial satisfaction with KiteLock was lower (50% find it neutral), but improved with familiarity, becoming comparable to heparin with 12 patients satisfied ( N = 14). Conclusions: KiteLock solution is well accepted by the patient or caregiver, despite involving more steps to use it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Vascular AccessSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207