MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414342472 · doi:10.1111/cgf.70220

DOBB‐BVH: Efficient Ray Traversal by Transforming Wide BVHs into Oriented Bounding Box Trees using Discrete Rotations

2025· article· en· W4414342472 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Kern, Alain Galvan, David R. Oldcorn, Daniel Skinner, Rohan Mehalwal, Matthäus G. Chajdas

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTree traversalBounding volumeBounding overwatchMinimum bounding boxPolytopeB-treeIntersection (aeronautics)Set (abstract data type)Ray tracing (physics)Node (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oriented bounding box (OBB) bounding volume hierarchies offer a more precise fit than axis‐aligned bounding box hierarchies in scenarios with thin elongated and arbitrarily rotated geometry, enhancing intersection test performance in ray tracing. However, determining optimally oriented bounding boxes can be computationally expensive and have high memory requirements. Recent research has shown that pre‐built hierarchies can be efficiently converted to OBB hierarchies on the GPU in a bottom‐up pass, yielding significant ray tracing traversal improvements. In this paper, we introduce a novel OBB construction technique where all internal node children share a consistent OBB transform, chosen from a fixed set of discrete quantized rotations. This allows for efficient encoding and reduces the computational complexity of OBB transformations. We further extend our approach to hierarchies with multiple children per node by leveraging Discrete Orientation Polytopes (k‐DOPs), demonstrating improvements in traversal performance while limiting the build time impact for real‐time applications. Our method is applied as a post‐processing step, integrating seamlessly into existing hierarchy construction pipelines. Despite a 12.6% increase in build time, our experimental results demonstrate an average improvement of 18.5% in primary, 32.4% in secondary rays, and maximum gain of 65% in ray intersection performance, highlighting its potential for advancing real‐time applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207