MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414345368 · doi:10.1094/phytofr-09-25-0096-a

Draft Genome Sequence of <i>Phytophthora abietivora</i> , a Root Rot Pathogen of True Firs in Managed Plantations

2025· article· en· W4414345368 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicolas Feau, Isabella Laughton, Guillaume Charron, Philippe Tanguay

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoFrontiers™ · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sport Centre PacificNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest Service
KeywordsGenomeNanopore sequencingSequence assemblyWhole genome sequencingPathogenicityPathogenReference genomeRoot rot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytophthora abietivora is a recently described root rot pathogen of true firs ( Abies spp.) and a major contributor to fir plantation decline in eastern North America. We present a 62.17-Mbp draft genome assembly of P. abietivora generated using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing technologies. The assembly comprises 2,917 scaffolds with an N50 of 43.8 kb, 99.7% completeness, and 15,906 predicted protein-coding genes, including 1,210 secreted proteins. Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis revealed extended runs of homozygosity and allele frequency shifts, suggesting dynamic extreme aneuploidy. This reference genome will serve as a critical resource for exploring the evolution and pathogenicity of P. abietivora and developing control strategies. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoFrontiers™Same topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207