Complement profiling of sural nerves in chronic-inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic-inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare immune-mediated polyneuropathy causing substantial disability. While both cell-mediated and humoral mechanisms contribute to CIDP, the role of complement remains poorly understood. Considering the rise of complement-targeted treatment, it is crucial to examine the role of complement in CIDP. In this cross-sectional, study, sural nerve biopsies from 55 CIDP patients were analyzed using histopathology, gene- and protein-based techniques, comparing them to two non-diseased controls (NDCs), as well as 8 patients with hereditary neuropathy (HN) and idiopathic axonal neuropathy (IPN). Overall, 94% (n = 52) revealed abnormal and prominent deposition of terminal complement complex C5b-9 on endoneurial capillaries. Patients with significant complement deposition presented with a progressive disease course (n = 52) and the number and distribution of infiltrating CD8 + T cells and CD68 + macrophages, since a basic immunological paradigm holds that those two may form an immunological synapse, correlated with clinical disease severity as measured by inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment sensory sum (INCAT) score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, changes in abundances of complement proteins as unveiled by untargeted proteomics accord with changes on transcript level as identified by targeted gene expression studies. In contrast, there was no complement deposition in NDC nor DC. This study provides an extensive evaluation of sural nerve specimens of CIDP patients finding a marked involvement of complement supporting the postulated concept of complement mediated demyelination in CIDP. Our results support the approach of targeting the complement system as a new and promising therapeutic strategy-at least in a subgroup of CIDP. Further research is warranted to unravel the functional implications and role of complement in CIDP progression and optimize patient care. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered under the German clinical trial registry ( https://www.drks.de ), DRKS0003245.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".