MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414367404 · doi:10.1093/aob/mcaf205

Spinning together agricultural and evo-devo research for <i>Gynandropsis gynandra</i> (spider plant)

2025· article· en· W4414367404 on OpenAlexaff
Brandi Zenchyzen, Jocelyn C. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Botany · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureTraitKey (lock)Adaptation (eye)Genetic resources

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Gynandropsis gynandra (Cleomaceae; formerly Cleome gynandra) is a leafy vegetable widely cultivated across Africa, uniquely positioned at the intersection of agricultural and evo-devo research. It is gaining recognition as an 'opportunity crop', valued locally for its nutritional and medicinal properties with ongoing agricultural research aimed at the development of improved cultivars and agronomic practices. Concurrently, its close evolutionary proximity to Arabidopsis thaliana, combined with its contrasting traits, positions G. gynandra as a model for studying C4 photosynthesis and floral development. Despite its relevance to both agricultural and evo-devo research, integration of findings between disciplines remains limited, hindered in part by inconsistent nomenclature and the lack of standardized morphological descriptors. SCOPE: To address this disconnect, this review synthesizes findings from agricultural and evo-devo research on G. gynandra. We provide an overview of its phylogenetic placement, geographical distribution, agricultural and medicinal applications, phytochemical profile, genomic and genetic resources, and morphological traits. In doing so, we emphasize the duality of G. gynandra as both a crop of agronomic interest and a model for evo-devo studies. Finally, we propose future research directions to promote cross-disciplinary collaboration and expedite progress in G. gynandra research. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in molecular tools have improved our understanding of the developmental mechanisms underlying key traits and physiological adaptations in G. gynandra, including C4 photosynthesis and antiherbivore defences. Simultaneously, morphological studies have revealed distinctive floral features and substantial phenotypic diversity, offering valuable insights for both breeding initiatives and investigations into floral development. Integrating data and resources from agricultural and evo-devo research will accelerate the improvement of G. gynandra and broaden its utility as a model for understanding trait evolution and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of BotanySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207