MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414370821 · doi:10.1177/13694332251375219

Numerical and theoretical investigations on flexural behavior of two-way RC slabs strengthened with BFRP grid-ECC composites

2025· article· en· W4414370821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Structural Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFlexural strengthParametric statisticsComposite numberBasalt fiberFailure mode and effects analysisFinite element methodFibre-reinforced plasticDuctility (Earth science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper delves into the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) two-way slabs strengthened with basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) grid and engineered cementitious composite (ECC). Building upon a prior comprehensive experimental investigation on slabs strengthened with BFRP-ECC composites, this study focuses on developing reliable strength models through the proposal of accurate finite element (FE) models. By meticulously comparing failure modes, load–deflection responses and strain developments of steel reinforcements and BFRP grids between FE predictions and experimental observations, the efficacy of the FE model in accurately predicting test results is demonstrated. The average ratio of the predicted to experimental ultimate load is 1.02, with a coefficient of variation of 0.041. A subsequent parametric study shed lights on key factors influencing the flexural performance of these strengthened slabs. It turned out that increasing ECC thickness significantly enhanced the flexural capacity, with an improvement ranging from 30.2% to 140.2%. Furthermore, a design-oriented model, incorporating the development of yield line and uniformity of BFRP strain is introduced, effectively capturing the ultimate load and moment of strengthened slabs. This research not only advances the understanding of the strengthening mechanism but also offers practical insights for designing and assessing such composite systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it