MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414372112 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c04544

Temperature-Dependent Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering at Ni L<sub>3</sub>-Edge for NaNiO<sub>2</sub> and LiNiO<sub>2</sub>

2025· article· en· W4414372112 on OpenAlexaff
Quentin Jacquet, K. Kummer, Marie Guignard, Elisa Grépin, Sathiya Mariyappan, N. B. Brookes, Sandrine Lyonnard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility
KeywordsScatteringInelastic scatteringResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringNickelResonance (particle physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LiNiO 2 is a promising cathode material for Li-ion batteries, but its atomic and electronic structure is under debate. Indeed, two sets of Ni–O distances are identified from local structural probes that are related to either Jahn–Teller distortion or bond disproportionation of NiO 6 octahedra. Moreover, LiNiO 2 undergoes a monoclinic to rhombohedral transition at 200 K, the origin of which is still unclear. On the other hand, isostructural NaNiO 2 shows differences from LiNiO 2, as it is a well-known Jahn–Teller distorted system, and it undergoes a monoclinic to rhombohedral transition at 500 K associated with the loss of the Jahn–Teller distortion. To understand better these differences, we report herein Ni L 3 -edge resonant inelastic X-ray scattering experiments on LiNiO 2 and NaNiO 2 at different temperatures (25–520 K) and follow the spectral changes below and above the phase transition temperatures. The observed RIXS spectra and the mapping indicate strong spectral changes for NaNiO 2, confirming the disappearance of Jahn–Teller distortion during phase transition, while the changes are minor for LiNiO 2, suggesting very few modifications in the local structure. Theoretical simulations of RIXS spectra are required for further understanding; however, we believe that the reported data set can be a crucial resource for developing advanced simulations that are essential for deepening our understanding of the atomic and electronic structure of these nickelates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207