Integrative Analysis of Left Ventricle and Epicardial Adipose Tissue Identifies SDHA and OGDH as Candidate Targets for Ischemic Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) involves coordinated molecular changes across heart; yet, their interplay remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated transcriptomic alterations in two heart tissue subtypes, left ventricle (LV) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), from age- and BMI-matched healthy and IHD individuals, including diabetic and non-diabetic patients. We performed transcriptomic profiling and systems-level network analysis to identify disease-associated gene expression changes. Our analysis revealed (1) stronger transcriptional responses in EAT than LV, particularly in diabetic individuals, and (2) widespread dysregulation of inflammatory and metabolic pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, cytokine signaling, and fatty acid degradation, across tissue subtypes. Co-expression network analysis uncovered shared gene modules, with SDHA and OGDH emerging as central, downregulated genes linked to mitochondrial function and inflammation, important processes in IHD pathophysiology. These findings were validated in independent human and mouse datasets. Overall, our integrative analysis identifies conserved molecular signatures across cardiac tissue subtypes, suggesting therapeutic potential in IHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".