MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414378855 · doi:10.1093/burnst/tkaf051

Advancing injectable hydrogels for wound treatment: targeted control of oxidative stress toward personalized regeneration

2025· review· en· W4414378855 on OpenAlexaff
Thai Thanh Hoang Thi, Cuong Hung Luu, Joo Hee Kim, J. Kent Leach, Ki Dong Park

Bibliographic record

VenueBurns & Trauma · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersKorea Evaluation Institute of Industrial TechnologyMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsWound healingChronic woundWound careRegeneration (biology)Oxidative stressDiabetic foot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wound injuries, including severe burns, diabetic foot ulcers, and chronic skin defects, remain a significant clinical burden due to their complexity, susceptibility to infection, and impaired healing, particularly in elderly individuals and patients with diabetes or vascular diseases. In these conditions, the wound healing process is disrupted by excessive oxidative stress, persistent inflammation, and microbial infection, ultimately leading to impaired tissue regeneration. These challenges highlight the urgent need for advanced wound care strategies capable of actively modulating the wound microenvironment to facilitate effective and timely healing. Among various hydrogel systems, injectable horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-catalyzed hydrogels have gained attention due to their biocompatibility, ease of application, tunable properties, ability to fill irregular wound geometries, versatility in material selection, and mild crosslinking conditions. These features make them promising candidates for multifunctional wound dressings in both acute and chronic wound management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in the development of injectable HRP-catalyzed hydrogels for wound treatment. We highlight key design strategies that confer multifunctional therapeutic capabilities, including hemostatic function, antibacterial activity, and reactive oxygen species-releasing and scavenging properties. Particular emphasis is placed on the incorporation of gasotransmitter-releasing components to regulate the wound microenvironment effectively. Furthermore, we discuss emerging strategies aimed at transforming these hydrogels into smart wound dressings with advanced functionalities, such as oxygen-releasing ability, electrical conductivity, and microbiome-modulating features. Finally, we emphasize the importance of developing scalable, safe, and personalized hydrogel systems capable of addressing the complex pathophysiology of chronic wounds and improving patient-specific wound care outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBurns & TraumaSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207