MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414380512 · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101498

Translation and Testing Psychometric Properties of the Thai Version of Vision Bolt-On EQ-5D in Patients With Visual Impairment

2025· article· en· W4414380512 on OpenAlexaff
Nuntachai Surawatsatien, Pear Pongsachareonnont, Sarinyaporn Waoraweewon, Gorawit Homkong, Anchisa Keereekeaw, Phantipa Sakthong

Bibliographic record

VenueValue in Health Regional Issues · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
KeywordsPsychological interventionVisual impairmentTranslation (biology)Dimension (graph theory)Low vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Thai versions of the vision bolt-on EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L, comparing them with the standard EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS in individuals with varying degrees of visual impairment. METHODS: Following EuroQol Translation Guidelines, the vision bolt-on items were translated through forward-backward processes and underwent cognitive debriefing. A total of 301 participants were interviewed at baseline, with 275 completing a 2-week follow-up. Known-groups validity was assessed based on visual acuity classifications and comorbidity status; convergent validity was tested by using Spearman's correlations. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted kappa. Responsiveness was analyzed using a standardized effect size in participants who reported better or worse vision. RESULTS: Both versions of the vision bolt-on had no missing data and demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC range 0.62-0.64). They effectively differentiated quality-of-life scores across varying degrees of vision impairment, showing reduced ceiling effects (5%-9%) compared with the standard EQ-5D. Correlations with EQ-VAS were moderate (rho 0.40-0.45). When participants reported improved vision, the vision bolt-on EQ-5D-5L exhibited the highest responsiveness, whereas all instruments were generally less responsive for worsening vision. CONCLUSIONS: The Thai versions of the vision bolt-on EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L demonstrated acceptable reliability, validity, and moderate responsiveness for capturing vision-related health changes, with the 5L version showing slightly greater sensitivity. These findings support the usefulness of adding a vision dimension to EQ-5D for Thai-speaking populations, facilitating more precise evaluations of interventions targeting visual health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueValue in Health Regional IssuesSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207