MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414390834 · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.124642

Low dissolved oxygen nitrification through kinetic selection

2025· article· en· W4414390834 on OpenAlexaff
José Jimenez, Kayla Bauhs, Mark W. Miller, Peter Dold, Ahmed Al‐Omari, Manel Garrido, Dev Hiripitiyage, Megan Wittman, Gillian Burger, Kartik Chandran, Belinda Sturm

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsEnviroSim (Canada)
FundersWater Research Foundation
KeywordsNitrificationAmmoniaNitrous oxideNitrateDominance (genetics)WastewaterMicrobial population biologyActivated sludgeSewage treatment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Low DO operation enables energy-efficient nitrification without infrastructure upgrades. • Long-term low DO exposure shifts nitrifier communities toward comammox and AOA dominance. • Nitrate production closely matches ammonia removal under low DO, indicating complete nitrification by CMX. • Comammox enrichment correlates with high oxygen affinity and improved nitrification performance. • Lower N₂O emissions observed in low DO systems due to reduced AOB/NOB activity. Recent research in wastewater treatment demonstrates that activated sludge plants can be operated more efficiently in terms of energy and carbon utilization without the need for new infrastructure through the implementation of low dissolved oxygen (DO) operation. The aim of this study was to understand how microbial communities adapt to long-term low DO operations and the implications for nitrification. This study synthesized findings from bench-scale and full-scale experiments to assess the impact of low DO operation on nitrification rates, microbial community structure, and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) generation. Long-term exposure to low DO conditions led to a shift in the nitrifier community structure, favoring comammox bacteria (CMX) and, in some cases, ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) over canonical ammonia-oxidizing and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (AOB, NOB). In conventional high-DO systems, the ratio of nitrate production rate to ammonia removal rate is approximately 0.78, reflecting the lower growth rate of NOB compared to AOB. However, in the low DO facilities studied, this ratio approached 1.0, indicating that nearly all ammonia removed was directly converted to nitrate. This finding strongly supports the dominance of CMX which can perform complete ammonia oxidation in a single organism. The correlation between increased CMX abundance and increased nitrate production rates was consistent across facilities operating at different DO levels. These adapted communities demonstrated higher oxygen affinity compared to AOB and NOB from plants operated at high DO concentrations. Long-term exposure of biomass to low DO concentration may have resulted in a decrease in N 2 O emissions since there is a low relative abundance of AOB and NOB, limiting N 2 O production via the hydroxylamine oxidation pathway and nitrifier denitrification by AOB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater ResearchSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207