Indirect Modeling of Post-Prandial Intestinal Lymphatic Uptake of Halofantrine Using PBPK Approaches: Limitations and Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Despite the recognized importance and distinctive characteristics of the intestinal lymphatic pathway in drug absorption, its pharmacokinetic modeling remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to address this gap by developing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) to represent the oral lymphatic uptake of halofantrine following a fatty meal. Methods: Using GastroPlus™ 9.8.3 and published literature data, halofantrine absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination in both fasting and fed states were modeled. As the used software does not directly simulate intestinal lymphatic transport, lymphatic involvement in the fed state was examined indirectly through parameter adjustments such as first-pass metabolism, pKa-driven solubility changes, and bile-salt-mediated solubilization, with the aid of molecular dynamics simulations under post-prandial pH. Results: The pharmacokinetic models revealed a reduction in the first-pass effect of halofantrine in the fed state compared to that in the fasting state. While adjustments in metabolism kinetics sufficed for constructing a representative PBPK model in the fasting state, capturing the fed-state profile required both modifications to metabolism kinetics and other parameters related to the structural rearrangements of halofantrine driven by the changes in intestinal pH following food intake. These changes were confirmed using molecular dynamics simulations of halofantrine in pHs reflecting the post-prandial conditions. Conclusions: This study underscores the need for further exploration and direct modeling of intestinal lymphatic uptake via PBPK models, highlighting its underexplored status in simulation algorithms. Moreover, the importance of integrating representative physicochemical factors for drugs, particularly in post-prandial conditions or lipid formulations, is evident. Overall, these findings contribute to advancing predictive regulatory and developmental considerations in drug development using post hoc analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".