MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414393535 · doi:10.4236/als.2025.134013

Man and Landscape: Literary Biodiversity and Aesthetic Revolution in Aimé Césaire and Alfred Alexandre

2025· article· en· W4414393535 on OpenAlexaff
Olga Hél-Bongo

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Literary Study · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCIMA+ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommodificationOrder (exchange)BiodiversityPaintingLexiconNeoliberalism (international relations)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines biodiversity in Caribbean literary texts in terms of the subject’s interaction with its environment. Using evocations of island and urban landscapes from Cahier d’un retour au pays natal, Moi laminaire, Le bar des Amériques and Les villes assassines, we show how the authors employ an environmental lexicon to express themselves while painting the world. The writing communicates a world devastated by a painful memory of slavery and a modern society stricken by extreme violence. The crisis of the living world, linked to the commodification of human beings from the slave trade to the neo-trafficking of drugs and prostitution, creates tensions and imbalances that the narrators try to rebalance through their reflections on the world. Literature enables us to reexamine these focal points of historical and contemporary domination in order to decry their mechanisms, in an innovative socio-poetic and aesthetic language, with a view to building a more viable and healthier society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.018
Scholarly communication0.0110.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Literary StudySame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207