MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414394145 · doi:10.21037/jtd-2024-2136

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in acute multiple rib fracture—a prospective analysis, randomized controlled trial and pilot study

2025· article· en· W4414394145 on OpenAlexaff
Jun-Seok Kim, Michael Ji, Dongkyu Kim, Woo Surng Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialClinical trialUltrasoundRib cageMEDLINEClinical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a non-invasive modality that promotes bone healing by stimulating callus formation and enhancing regeneration. Although its efficacy in long bone fractures is well established, its role in managing acute multiple rib fractures (MRFs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether LIPUS can improve fracture healing and pain control in patients with acute MRF following thoracic trauma. Methods: This prospective, randomized study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LIPUS in promoting bone healing through callus formation and modifying pain patterns in patients with acute MRF. The primary objective was to determine whether LIPUS could improve fracture healing outcomes and provide superior pain control compared to conventional treatment. Between April 1, 2024 and October 31, 2024, twenty adult patients with rib fractures were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (I) the LIPUS group (n=10), who received standard rib fracture care supplemented with LIPUS therapy; and (II) the conventional group (n=10), who received standard care alone. Clinical and demographic characteristics, outcomes, and surgical complications were assessed. The primary endpoints included the effect of LIPUS on clinical manifestations and pain control in acute MRF. Results: . 18.00±9.36 days, P=0.16). While outcomes such as hemothorax, pneumothorax, atelectasis, and inflammation were similar, Chest Trauma Score (CTS) and Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) were significantly higher in the LIPUS group (P=0.001). Despite initially higher pain scores, significant improvement was observed after two LIPUS sessions (P=0.001). No intensive care unit (ICU) transfers or deaths occurred. Conclusions: LIPUS appears to be a viable and effective treatment option for acute MRF. It may alleviate pain, reduce complications, and improve clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with traumatic hemothorax or pneumothorax. Trial Registration: This study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS: a non-profit online registry for clinical trials and research conducted in South Korea) under the reference number KCT0010838.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic DiseaseSame topicTrauma Management and DiagnosisFrench-language works237,207