Prolonged Venous Transit Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcomes in Anterior Circulation Distal Medium Vessel Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Distal medium-vessel occlusion (DMVO) strokes represent a significant proportion of acute ischemic stroke cases, yet optimal management remains unclear. Prolonged venous transit (PVT), a marker of poor venous outflow, has been associated with worse outcomes in large-vessel occlusion strokes, but its role in DMVO is unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with anterior-circulation DMVO, defined as occlusions in the M2-M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery or the anterior cerebral artery. PVT status was determined on pretreatment time-to-maximum perfusion maps by identifying ≥10-s delays in either the posterior superior sagittal sinus or the torcula. Baseline characteristics, imaging findings, and interventions were collected. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. RESULTS: Among 77 patients (median age 70 years, 56% female), 18 (23%) had PVT. Median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 11 (interquartile range, 7-15), and intravenous thrombolysis was administered to 35% of patients. Patients with PVT+ were less likely to achieve mRS 0-2 at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.85; p = 0.046). There were no significant differences in rates of hemorrhagic transformation or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PVT is independently associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in anterior-circulation DMVO. These findings suggest PVT may serve as a prognostic indicator and could inform treatment decisions in this challenging stroke subtype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".