MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414397083 · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114406

LED interlighting: a cost-effective strategy to increase yield and chemical uniformity of Cannabis sativa at commercial scale

2025· article· en· W4414397083 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin Bohemen, Sabrina Carvalho, Céline C.S. Nicole, Donald L. Smith, Mark Lefsrud

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Horticulturae · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMcGill University
KeywordsYield (engineering)InflorescenceCannabis sativaBiomass (ecology)Light-emitting diodeSodium-vapor lampCrop yieldCanopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cannabinoid uniformity plays an important role in the quality and marketability of cannabis products. Light is an important environmental factor determining increased yield and improved secondary compound production, while energy consumption is a primary concern as lighting is one of the main input costs for controlled environment cannabis production systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate lighting strategies and compare these to commercial cultivation methods that maximize yield and uniformity of cannabinoids in cannabis plants. Four lighting treatments were investigated, including high pressure sodium (HPS) toplight, light-emitting diodes (LED) toplight, HPS toplight + interlight and LED toplight + interlight. Plants grown under HPS toplight displayed increased plant height. LED treatments significantly increased dry inflorescence mass compared to HPS treatments. The addition of interlighting increased biomass produced in the lower canopy, resulting in a significant increase in biomass produced per cannabis plant. When comparing light use efficiency (grams per mol), HPS toplight significantly increased inflorescence mass produced per mol of light received. However, analysis of power use efficiency expressed in grams per kilowatt-hour (kWh) revealed that LEDs provided increased yield at lower energy cost. LED toplight led to a 7 % improvement over HPS, with a 2 % increase in secondary metabolite production for Δ- 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) ( p < 0.05). Interlighting did not significantly impact the lower canopy inflorescence THC values. LED treatments were more energy efficient at producing grams THC when analyzing THC power use efficiency. Cannabigerol concentrations significantly increased with LED treatments compared to HPS. Major terpenes showed no significant differences between treatments. This study has demonstrated the added benefit of implementing interlighting and LED toplighting in an indoor controlled environment cannabis production system. Importantly, LED toplight and interlight strategies show potential in competing with conventional HPS lighting strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientia HorticulturaeSame topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207