MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Amine free direct air capture integrated with buildings’ cooling systems in humid environments

2025· article· en· W4414398935 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser M. Abdullatif, Riham Surkatti, Raeesh Muhammad, Ahmed Sodiq, Nashaat N. Nassar, Tareq Al‐Ansari, Abdulkarem I. Amhamed

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Conversion and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersQatar National LibraryQatar National Research FundHamad Bin Khalifa UniversityQatar Foundation
KeywordsWater coolingAmine gas treatingAir coolingFree coolingEvaporative coolerActive cooling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct air capture, among the negative emission technologies, is well positioned to reach climate goals. However, adsorption-based direct air capture system faces significant challenges in humid environments due to water-CO 2 co-adsorption, which substantially increases thermal regeneration energy requirements and negatively impacts overall efficiency. To overcome this problem, this study presents novel direct air capture systems integrated with air handling units incorporating a silica gel wheel to dehumidify air before the adsorption process. Dehumidification of air by integrated silica gel wheel enhances the performance of physisorbents and chemisorbents such as NbOFFIVE, Zeolite-13X, SBA-15 functionalized with tetraethylenepentamine, SBA-15 functionalized with L-PEI, and Lewatit by reducing moisture, thereby improving CO 2 capture efficiency in humid environments. After capture, saturated part of silica gel wheel meet the moisture-free airstream and regenerate the water without heating and raising the stream humidity approaching the desired indoor humidity levels. The findings presented are supported by both experimental work and mathematical models. This integration significantly reduces thermal regeneration energy requirements by 82 % for NbOFFIVE and 39 % for SBA-15 with tetraethylenepentamine compared to non - silica gel wheel configurations. Moreover, compared to operating direct air capture and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems separately, in which their combined thermal energy is 304.73 kWh/day, the integrated system consumes only 128.52 kWh/day of thermal energy, cutting total thermal energy use by 57.8 %. Even against heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system alone (149.08 kWh/day), it achieves a thermal energy saving of 13.8 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Conversion and ManagementSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207