Total X‐Ray Fluorescence Measurement of Spherical Gold Nanoparticle Uptake by <scp>PC</scp> ‐3 Cells: Dual‐Phase Kinetic Uptake and Modelling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The literature on the cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is currently limited in long‐term studies (> 10 h) and the applicability of mathematical uptake models to experimental data. Here, the uptake of AuNPs of diameters 5, 10, and 20 nm at concentrations of 10 and 40 μM was measured up to 48 h in PC‐3 cells. Total reflection x‐ray fluorescence (TXRF) spectroscopy was used for quantification. AuNP uptake was observed to increase with higher extracellular concentration and to have an inverse‐size dependency. Uptake kinetics were fundamentally similar across all conditions, with two plateaus. A new kinetic model of AuNP uptake was developed with two phases of uptake. The second phase had significantly higher uptake than the first. This model fits the experimental data well, with R 2 values ranging from 0.8298 to 0.9876. Rate constants of uptake were found to decrease with AuNP diameter, across both uptake phases. In addition to the insight into NP cellular interactions, this work also showcases the strong capabilities of TXRF as a cellular analysis tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it