MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414407314 · doi:10.4324/9781003615675-22

Are Preschoolers Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines?

2025· book-chapter· en· W4414407314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge Carlos‐Vivas, María Mendoza-Muñoz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activityRecreationPsychological interventionSocioeconomic statusCognitionHealth promotion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter emphasizes the critical role of physical activity in the health and development of preschool children (3–5 years). It highlights the consensus among global health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), on the need for preschoolers to engage in at least 180 minutes of daily physical activity of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity. The Canadian and Australian 24-Hour Physical Activity Guidelines further support this recommendation, linking regular physical activity to improved motor skills, cognitive development, and reduced risk of obesity. Despite the established guidelines, compliance rates among preschool children vary widely between countries, with only about 11% meeting the full 24-hour physical activity recommendations. Factors influencing these differences include cultural norms, access to recreational facilities, parental attitudes, and socioeconomic status. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these contextual factors to develop effective interventions tailored to specific populations. It also distinguishes between general physical activity guidelines and integrated 24-hour physical activity guidelines, which include not only physical activity but also sedentary time and sleep recommendations. This holistic approach recognizes the interdependence of these behaviours in promoting optimal health and development. The role of parents and caregivers is highlighted as essential in modelling active behaviours and fostering supportive environments that encourage physical activity. The findings call for a global commitment to increasing physical activity levels among preschool children, advocating for policies and strategies that consider the unique cultural and environmental contexts of different regions. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the need for effective interventions and policies to promote physical activity in early childhood, recognizing the long-term benefits of establishing healthy movement habits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→