Preoperative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To explore the outcomes of elderly patients (≥75 years) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with either short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) at a regional cancer center. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients aged ≥75 with biopsy-confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma treated with either SCRT or CRT between January 2017 and June 2020. Patients were excluded if they had metastatic disease, recurrent cancer, or received palliative radiotherapy without surgical intent. SCRT consisted of 25 Gy in five fractions, with surgery performed either immediately or after a delay of six to eight weeks. CRT consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine, followed by delayed surgery. Outcomes assessed included surgical margin status, pathological complete response (pCR), local recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results A total of 46 patients met the inclusion criteria (SCRT: 34; CRT: 12). Radiotherapy was completed in 34 patients (100%) in the SCRT group and 11 patients (92%) in the CRT group. Surgery was performed in 28 (82%) of the SCRT patients and 11 (92%) of CRT patients. R0 resection was achieved in 86% (n=24) of SCRT and 100% (n=12) of CRT patients. No pathologic complete responses were observed. Local recurrence was observed in 2 SCRT patients (5.9%), and no recurrences occurred in the CRT group. Distant metastases developed in 3 SCRT (8.8%) and 2 CRT (16.7%) patients. With a median follow-up of 24 months, OS was 73.5% (SCRT) vs. 75% (CRT), and CSS was 73.5% (SCRT) vs. 91.7% (CRT), with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion Both SCRT and CRT were well tolerated and achieved high R0 resection rates with low recurrence in elderly patients with LARC. CRT showed slight trends toward greater nodal downstaging, while SCRT offered comparable survival with fewer treatment-related complications and greater flexibility in surgical timing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".