MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414410836 · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0159.25

A Fully Virtual Graded Exertion Test Is Safe and Feasible in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Children With Concussion

2025· article· en· W4414410836 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie Coupal, Daria Shabanova, Isabelle Gagnon, Lisa Grilli, Christine Beaulieu, Elizabeth F. Teel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Athletic Training · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University Health CentreConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionExertionRating of perceived exertionAsymptomaticRehabilitationProtocol (science)Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnairePerceived exertionHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context Current graded exertion tests (GXTs) for concussion management require specialized equipment and in-person supervision. The Montreal Virtual Exertion (MOVE) protocol is a telehealth-compatible GXT but has been tested only in pseudo-virtual conditions. Objective To determine the safety and feasibility of the MOVE protocol when administered remotely to children with concussion. Design Cohort study. Setting Virtual visit. Patients or Other Participants Asymptomatic (9 girls, 6 boys; age = 12.9 ± 2.7 years, time postconcussion = 40.8 ± 19.2 days) and symptomatic (9 girls, 6 boys; age = 12.9 ± 2.5 years, time postconcussion = 28.7 ± 23.0 days) children with concussion were recruited from the Montreal Children’s Hospital Concussion Clinic between November 2023 and June 2024. Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants completed the MOVE protocol and a follow-up visit 24 hours later over Zoom. The MOVE protocol consists of 7 plyometric exercises performed for 60 seconds with 60 seconds of rest between stages. Safety (adverse events) and feasibility measures (protocol, outcomes, intensity, and technology categories) were collected. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate exercise intensity outcomes with all other outcomes analyzed using chi-square tests. Results One participant in each group experienced a minor adverse event (symptom increase of ≥10 points on the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory at the 24-hour visit); however, no major adverse events were reported. Mean heart rate (78.7 ± 33.6 beats/min; P < .001) and rate of perceived exertion (4.87 ± 1.50; P < .001) change scores increased throughout the MOVE protocol, but no main effect of group or interaction effect was observed. Feasibility outcomes were less likely to be captured during the rest period for asymptomatic children (outcomes not collected on time on 33 [31.4%] of 105 occasions) than symptomatic children (11 [11.7%] of 94 occasions; = 10.1, P < .001). Otherwise, all outcomes met the a priori definition of feasibility. Conclusions The MOVE protocol can be safely and feasibly administered virtually. A no-equipment, virtual GXT can remove barriers to exercise testing and broaden access to best-practice concussion-management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Athletic TrainingSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207