Revised guideline for central nervous system oxygen toxicity exposure limits when using an inspired PO2 of 1.3 atmospheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technical and scientific divers breathing gases delivering hyperbaric pressures of inspired oxygen may be at risk of developing cerebral oxygen toxicity which can manifest as a seizure with little or no warning. The principle preventative strategy is adherence to time limits based on inspired PO₂ levels promulgated in 1991. These limits had their origins in US Navy studies of exposures to higher inspired PO₂s than are typically utilised by modern divers. Indeed, the duration limits for inspired PO₂s in the range typically utilised by technical divers (≤ 1.3-1.4 atm) have relatively little experimental provenance. Contemporary technical dives often involve decompression durations that result in breaches of these limits, and anecdotally, this common occurrence seems associated with a low risk of cerebral oxygen toxicity. A committee of experts recently sought experimental evidence that might support an adjustment to the recommended duration limits for typical technical dives. Such evidence exists only for an inspired PO₂ of 1.3 atm, which is a common default in use of constant PO₂ rebreather devices. The (1991) limit for a single exposure to an inspire PO₂ of 1.3 atm is 180 min with a 24-hour maximum of 210 min. Recent studies provide reassurance that dives with an inspired PO₂ of 1.3 atm consisting of up to 240 min of working dive activity followed by up to 240 min of resting decompression are associated with an acceptably low risk of cerebral oxygen toxicity. This recommendation was promulgated and endorsed at a recent workshop convened by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) involving technical and scientific divers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".