Sexual Development Issues of Children in Japanese Residential Care Facilities and Staff Responses: A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the unique challenges of the Japanese child welfare system with a specific focus on residential foster care facilities. In Japan, the foster care system has yet to be fully developed, resulting in many children with no parental care being placed in institutional settings. This study examines how staff at residential foster care facilities perceive and respond to children’s sexual development, with the goal of identifying the need for training and support in managing related issues. Ten staff members from five children’s welfare facilities participated in semi-structured interviews, which were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes in staff perceptions and responses to children's sexual development. The results revealed four themes of staff perception: (1) psychological distance from other people, (2) difficulty associated with responding to precocious sexual development, (3) importance of forming attachments, and (4) insufficient sexual education. The study revealed that despite staff awareness of sexual issues among children, they struggled to respond effectively, often relying on trial-and-error approaches to sex education. Furthermore, the lack of specialized sex education programs placed a significant burden on staff. To address this gap, developing targeted programs and providing expert support would help alleviate staff workload and better support children's needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".