MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414414133 · doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1633021

A threat detection scheme for financial big data in internet of things

2025· article· en· W4414414133 on OpenAlexaff
Junzhe Jia, Qin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataConvolutional neural networkContext (archaeology)Feature extractionKey (lock)Deep learningInternet of ThingsScheme (mathematics)Dependency (UML)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the deep application of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in the financial field, the transmission, storage and processing of massive financial data face complex and diverse security threats. This paper proposes a threat detection scheme, CNN - BiLSTM - GAM, which is based on the vulnerabilities of IoT devices in financial big data scenarios and deep learning algorithms. By analyzing the traffic data and behavioral patterns generated by IoT devices during data collection and other processes, it extracts key features and identifies security threats such as malicious attacks. CNN-BiLSTM-GAM includes Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) and global attention module (GAM), which accurately extract spatial features of input financial data through one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN). At the same time, BiLSTM layer captures the context dependency relationship in time series data through forward and backward networks. It optimizes the extraction of temporal features, finally assigns weights to input features through the global attention obtained by concatenating channel attention and spatial attention. The experimental results show that CNN-BiLSTM-GAM performs well with 96.81% of ACC and 96.79% of F1 on NSL-KDD, 96.98% of ACC and 96.46% of F1 on CICIDS2017, demonstrating better spatiotemporal feature extraction capabilities and providing technical support for ensuring the security of financial big data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysicsSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207