MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414419776 · doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.014

Real-time magnetic resonance-guided radiofrequency ablation and lesion evaluation in an magnetic resonance-compatible isolated beating pig heart platform

2025· article· en· W4414419776 on OpenAlexaff
Luuk H G A Hopman, Eric Schrauben, Jules L. Nelissen, Pieter Reitzema, Machteld Boonstra, Bart L.M. Smeets, Renate W. Boekhoven, Daniel Sunnarborg, Jouke Smink, Hans W.M. Niessen, Cornelis P. Allaart, Aart J. Nederveen, Marco Götte

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm O2 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
FundersMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en VoedselkwaliteitITEA3
KeywordsRadiofrequency ablationLesionAblationHeart diseaseMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers real-time, radiation-free guidance for complex procedures such as myocardial ablation, marking a promising advance in electrophysiology. However, further development is limited by challenges in magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible instrument testing, MRI sequence validation, and accurate correlation with histopathology, hindered by the limitations of in vivo tissue evaluation. Objective: This study investigated the feasibility of real-time MR-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation in an MR-compatible isolated beating pig heart platform and characterized ablation lesions using MRI and histopathology. Methods: A heart from a pig slaughtered for human consumption was prepared under regulatory guidelines and connected to a custom-built, MR-compatible perfusion platform supporting left ventricular function in both Langendorff and working modes. Autologous heparinized blood circulated at physiological pressures and temperatures. MR-guided catheter navigation and RF ablation were performed on a Philips 3T scanner using active catheter tracking. Native T1 and T2 mapping were acquired before and after ablation. Lesions were confirmed by histologic analysis. Results: RF ablation (50 W, 60 seconds) was successfully performed at 5 left ventricular sites. MRI showed focal reductions in T1 (936 ± 80 ms) surrounded by elevated T1 (1357 ± 18 ms) and T2 values (86 ± 10 ms) compared with nonablated myocardium (T1 1192 ± 26 ms; T2 66 ± 6 ms), consistent with necrosis and edema. Histology confirmed a necrotic core with a surrounding rim showing contraction band necrosis and erythrocyte extravasation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of real-time MR-guided ablation in a beating pig heart platform. The setup allows high-resolution lesion assessment and histologic correlation, supporting future developments in MR-guided therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeart Rhythm O2Same topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207