MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of energy storage performance and cycling stability of electrochemically synthesized PANI–ZnFe2O4 electrodes

2025· article· en· W4414424588 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anwar‐ul‐Haq Ali Shah, Salma Bilal, Philipp Röse

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigher Education Commision, PakistanInstitute for Advancements in Mental Health
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyPolyanilineCapacitancePseudocapacitorElectrodeElectrochemistrySupercapacitorComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conducting polymer-metal oxide hybrids are promising electrode materials for supercapacitors, yet achieving a balance between high capacitance and long-term stability remains challenging. In this work, polyaniline (PANI) - zinc ferrite (ZnFe₂O₄) composites were synthesized by in situ electrochemical polymerization of aniline with controlled deposition duration for ZnFe 2 O 4 -nanoparticle incorporation. Structural and spectroscopic characterization confirmed uniform dispersion of ZnFe 2 O 4 within the polymer matrix and the formation of fibrous nanostructures. Electrochemical analysis revealed a progressive enhancement of redox activity and charge storage with increasing ZnFe 2 O 4 content. The optimized composite exhibited a specific capacitance of up to 1402 F g⁻¹ at 1 A g⁻¹, together with an energy density of 141.9 Wh kg⁻¹ and a power density of 404.9 W kg⁻¹. When assembled into a symmetric supercapacitor, the PANI-zinc ferrite composite retained 97.6% of its initial capacitance after 10,000 charge–discharge cycles. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy further indicated that structural degradation under accelerated aging is primarily associated with particle and polymer chain cracking/breaking, leading to increased mass transport resistance, thereby reducing the energy storage capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrochimica ActaSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207