MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414439823 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101131

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF OBICETRAPIB IN PATIENTS WITH HETEROZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA

2025· article· en· W4414439823 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen C. Nicholls, Adam J. Nelson, Marc Ditmarsch, John J.P. Kastelein, Christie M. Ballantyne, Kausik K Ray, Ann Marie Návar, Steven E. Nissen, Anne C. Goldberg, Liam R. Brunham, Erin Wuerdeman, Annie Neild, Douglas Kling, Brian A. Ference, Maciej Banach, Roxana Mehran, Alberico L. Catapano, Michael H. Davidson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityPlaceboFamilial hypercholesterolemiaClinical endpointAdverse effectClinical trialApolipoprotein B

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pharmacologic Therapy BROOKLYN examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib 10 mg, as an adjunct to maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and suboptimal LDL-C control. This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial NCT05425745 with 1 year follow up in 354 patients across 70 sites. Participants (n=354) with HeFH and fasting LDL-C ³70 mg/dL taking maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies were randomly assigned to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or matching placebo orally daily for 52 weeks in a 2:1 ratio. Study primary endpoint assessed obicetrapib compared with placebo in LS mean percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C. Secondary endpoints included obicetrapib compared with placebo in percent changes from baseline in Apo B, nonHDL-C, HDL-C, total-C, Lp(a), and TG, and safety measures; Apo A1 was an exploratory endpoint. Mean baseline lipoprotein lipid levels for obicetrapib and placebo, respectively, were LDL-C: 123.4 and 119.9 mg/dL; ApoB: 107.2 and 105.3 mg/dL; non-HDL-C: 148.4 and 146.7 mg/dL; and HDL-C: 53.2 and 50.2 mg/dL. Obicetrapib, compared with placebo, significantly reduced mean LDL-C -36.3% at day 84 (P<0.0001) and -41.5% at day 365 (P<0.0001). On day 84 and day 365, obicetrapib, compared with placebo, significantly reduced mean ApoB -24.4%, -25.8%; non-HDL-C -34.5%, -37.5%; Lp(a) -45.9%, -54.3%; and increased HDL-C 138.7%,121.4%, respectively. Obicetrapib was well tolerated with no serious adverse events or clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or other clinical laboratory values. Obicetrapib, as an adjunct to maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, produced significant LDL-C lowering at day 84 with sustained effect through day 365 in patients with HeFH. Obicetrapib holds promise for patients with HeFH who are unable to attain their LDL-C treatment targets with available lipid-lowering agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207