MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414459860 · doi:10.1186/s13023-025-03960-5

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and clinical presentation of thrombotic microangiopathies: data from a laboratory centralizing ADAMTS-13 testing in Quebec

2025· article· en· W4414459860 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Clémence Merlen, Sandrine Thouzeau‐Benghezal, Emmanuelle Pépin, Samuel Guay, Anne‐Laure Lapeyraque, Alexandra Cambier, Georges‐Étienne Rivard, Stéphan Troyanov, Arnaud Bonnefoy

Bibliographic record

VenueOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCHU Sainte-Justine FoundationAlexion PharmaceuticalsSanofi
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)PandemicThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Presentation (obstetrics)Epidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) primarily induces respiratory symptoms. However, some patients develop thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) during their infection. This study aimed to compare the incidence and clinical presentation of patients referred for TMA suspicion in Quebec (Canada) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing data from a laboratory centralizing ADAMTS-13 testing. RESULTS: During the pre-pandemic period (2017–2019), 500 patients were referred for TMA suspicion, of whom 423 had no prior TMA episodes. Among these, 50 patients exhibited ADAMTS-13 activity ≤ 10%, confirming a diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). In the pandemic period (2020–2022), 683 patients were referred for TMA suspicion, with 600 experiencing their first TMA episode. TTP was identified in 53 patients. In our cohort, the mean incidence of TTP cases remained steady between the pre-pandemic and the pandemic period (approximately 2 cases per million persons per year). Females with TTP were younger during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (median age 41.5 vs. 51.5 years; p = 0.032). Overall, the clinical presentation of TTP and suspected TMA other than TTP patients remained comparable between the two periods. The mean incidence of suspected TMA other than TTP cases increased in males during the pandemic compared to the previous period (20.3 vs. 12.7 per million persons per year; p = 0.023), particularly in men aged 50–59 years (28.7 vs. 11.9 per million persons per year; p = 0.05). A weak cross-correlation between new COVID-19-related hospitalizations and new cases of suspected TMA other than TTP was observed, peaking at a lag of 1 week (r = 0.258). COVID-19-associated TMA was suspected in 17 patients, with 3 cases confirmed as TTP based on ADAMTS-13 activity results. Patients with suspected TMA other than TTP associated with COVID-19 were predominantly male (86%) with a median age of 53 years (IQR: 43.2–69.2). CONCLUSION: The incidence of TTP did not change during COVID-19 pandemic. An increase referral of other suspected TMA was observed in our cohort, especially in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrphanet Journal of Rare DiseasesSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207