BrainAuth: A Neuro-Biometric Approach for Personal Authentication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The literature repeatedly reports that the unique nature of individual brainwave patterns makes them suitable for identification and authentication, because they are difficult to replicate or forge. Therefore, many researchers have utilized brainwaves for authentication by training traditional deep learning and machine learning models. However, the internal decision processes of these black-box models have not been evaluated in terms of biases, overfitting, large training data requirements, and handling complex data structures, which keep them in a fuzzy state. To address these limitations, a smart system is needed to be develop that could be capable of making the authentication process user-friendly, robust, and reliable. In this paper, we present a deep reinforcement learning-based biometric authentication framework known as "BrainAuth" for personal identification using the gamma ($\gamma$) and beta ($\beta$) brainwaves. This approach improves the accuracy of authentication by using the (i) Dyna framework and a dual estimation technique. Both these technique helps to maintain the integrity of brainwave patterns, which are needed for authentication and understanding of spoofing activities. (ii) We also introduce a layered structure architecture in the proposed model to reduce the time needed for exploration using two deep neural networks. These networks work together to handle the complex data while making decisions in delay sensitive environment. (iii) We evaluate the model on seen and unseen data to verify its robustness. During analysis, the model achieved an equal error rate (EER) of $\approx$ 0.07% for seen data and $\approx$ 0.15% for unseen data, respectively. Furthermore, the analysis metrics such as true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) followed by false acceptance rate (FAR), false rejection rate (FRR), true acceptance rate (TAR) revealed significant improvements compared to existing schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".