Digital Twin Enabled Performance Optimization of Machine Tools: A Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital twin (DT) is an emerging technology within the Industry 4.0 landscape. They represent a connection between a physical system, object, or process and its virtual representation, and are ideal candidates to augment control and decision-making capabilities in systems. They allow for real-time model, parameter, and state identification and updates, which can enable and enhance various control and performance improvement schemes. An ideal application case for this technology would be a machine tool (MT) which are critical manufacturing systems. MTs have various subsystems which work together to accomplish various tasks, they are often electro-mechanical and can include: the spindle, feed drives, tool changer, and cooling system. Precise control is essential for these subsystems, as work pieces produced using MTs are often required to adhere to the most rigorous standards of geometric tolerance. This work examines the potential performance and control improvements when implementing a DT by examining the literature on current applications of DT for improving control and performance in MTs. It was shown that DT has been successfully applied to improve performance and outcomes by implementing real-time performance monitoring, improving control scheme optimization, and enabling dynamic machining parameter adjustments. With these improvements, benefits were seen in surface finish, geometric conformance, cycle time, tracking errors, and disturbance rejection. While still in the early stages of development, DTs have been shown to be a promising paradigm for MT performance optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".