MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414475925 · doi:10.2196/77336

Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture at Sensitized Acupoints for Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4414475925 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zenan Wu, Zehao Hu, Zixuan Xu, Xu Zhou, Haifeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialAcupunctureProtocol (science)RandomizationClinical trialResearch design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent osteoarthritic disorder. Although acupuncture is increasingly used in clinical practice for KOA management, its efficacy remains to be further optimized. OBJECTIVE: This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture at sensitized acupoints for the treatment of KOA. METHODS: We will recruit 350 patients diagnosed with KOA from 3 clinical centers in this single-blind, sham-controlled, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to receive either acupuncture at 5 high-probability sensitized acupoints or sham acupuncture with nonpenetrative needling using Takakura acupuncture simulation devices. Both groups will receive 24 sessions over 8 weeks, followed by a 16-week posttreatment follow-up period. The primary outcome is the proportion of responders, defined as a reduction of 2 or more points in the Numeric Rating Scale score at week 8. Secondary outcomes include changes in scores on validated scales for KOA severity, walking distance, disability, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and pain self-efficacy. Adverse events will be documented for safety evaluation. RESULTS: The first participant was enrolled on February 15, 2025, and by June 28, 2025, we had enrolled 25 patients. Data analysis has not yet been initiated. The completion of data collection is anticipated by March 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This trial aims to provide confirmatory and exploratory evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of sensitized acupoint-based acupuncture for treating KOA. If the hypothesized benefits are substantiated, sensitized acupoint-based acupuncture could emerge as a complementary and alternative therapy for KOA, potentially reducing reliance on medication and mitigating drug-related adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06805188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06805188. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77336.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207