MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414483721 · doi:10.21037/qims-2025-834

Functional connectivity and graph theory of impaired central visual pathways in acute ischemic stroke based on functional magnetic resonance imaging

2025· article· en· W4414483721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiuli Chu, Xiaofeng Xu, Binqiang Xue, Lin Zhang, Qi Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingFunctional connectivityMagnetic resonance imagingIschemic strokeStroke (engine)Graph theoryGraphVisual system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke represents a major contributor to disability, resulting in functional impairments and imposing a societal burden. Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) indicates brain interactions, with dynamic alterations offering insights into cerebral function. This study used static and dynamic functional connectivity (sFC/dFC) and machine learning (ML) models to assess FC alterations in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), aiming to identify connections that distinguish patients from healthy controls (HCs) and study their potential as biomarkers. Methods: A clinical trial took place at the Stroke Center of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University from March 2021 to September 2022 (trial registration date: 26 May 2021). A total of 22 patients were enrolled, 6 were lost to follow-up, and 26 HCs were recruited (10 males, 16 females, average age: 66.62±7.53 years). We performed a comparative analysis of whole-brain sFC among three groups: 12 patients and 26 HCs who completed the 3-month experiment, 12 patients and 26 HCs who participated in the 7-day experiment, and 12 patients who underwent both experiments. Whole-brain sFC analysis utilized the Yeo 7-network parcellation (Yeo-7) and 90 automated anatomical labeling (AAL) regions of interest (ROIs). The dFC analysis revealed two states: State 1 (weak, high-frequency), and State 2 (strong, low-frequency). Linear support vector machine (linear-SVM), radial basis function support vector machine (RBF-SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), and decision tree (TREE) models were trained using sFC features. Results: Patients with AIS had significantly altered ventral attention network (VAN) and default mode network (DMN) connectivity compared to HCs. Clinical assessments showed cognitive impairment at 7 days [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): 19.42±10.64, P<0.001], improving at 3 months (MoCA: 20.58±4.89, P<0.05). Analysis of sFC revealed significant changes in different brain regions (P<0.05). dFC analysis identified two distinct states: a "high-frequency weakly connected" state at 7 days (63.61%) and a "low-frequency strong connection" state at 3 months (36.39%). ML models (RBF-SVM, RF, TREE) were utilized to identify optimal feature subsets, with RBF-SVM demonstrating superior performance [area under the curve (AUC): 0.85, accuracy: 85%]. Conclusions: Changes in FC among patients with AIS, particularly within the DMN, visual system (VIS), and limbic network (LIM) networks, may serve as possible biomarkers. ML models employing sFC characteristics are promising for stroke classification and prognosis prediction and improve the understanding of stroke-related neurological impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and SurgerySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207