MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414490629 · doi:10.1186/s13071-025-07027-z

Field efficacy of Febantel, Pyrantel embonate and Praziquantel (Drontal® Tasty) against naturally acquired intestinal helminths of hunting dogs in southern Italy

2025· article· en· W4414490629 on OpenAlexaff
Farwa Humak, Francesco Buono, Vincenzo Veneziano, Diego Piantedosi, Elisa Castaldo, Stefano Scarcelli, Francesco Locantore, Anna Paola Rivolta, Stefania Rotondi, Norbert Mencke, Katrin Blazejak

Bibliographic record

VenueParasites & Vectors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsVétoquinol (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrantelPraziquantelHelminthsParasitologyHelminthiasisAnthelminticCestodaCestode infections

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Dogs in rural areas and hunting dogs in particular, are at higher risk of intestinal helminth infections compared with family dogs. Thus, certain management practices including faecal/coprological analysis, implementing regular deworming protocols, post-treatment evaluations and high-quality hygiene are required in hunting dogs to maintain their health and activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Drontal ® Tasty (Vetoquinol S.A.) for the treatment of gastrointestinal helminths in naturally infected hunting dogs in Italy during the hunting and non-hunting season. Methods Hunting dogs ( n = 387) faecal samples were collected from Campania and Basilicata regions, and study was divided into two phases: hunting (P1) and non-hunting (P2) periods. Each sample was screened using Mini-FLOTAC technique with ZnSO 4 as flotation medium (SG: 1.350). The dogs ( n = 142) were enrolled on the basis of pre-screening faecal egg counts at day 0 of P1. Dogs exhibiting ≥ 50 EPG species were treated on day 0 of P1 and sampled on day 0, 7 and 14 for faecal analysis. Dogs enrolled in P1 were again controlled in P2 ( n = 128) regardless of EPG following the same scheme of P1. The primary criterion for treatment efficacy was the reduction of faecal egg count after D7 and D14 in both P1 and P2. Results The anthelmintic efficacy of Drontal ® Tasty against Toxocara canis was 99.7% and 100% at day 14 in P1 and P2, respectively; for Toxascaris leonina 100% at day 14 in P1, for Ancylostomatidae 100% at day 14 in both P1 and P2; for Trichuris vulpis 88.6% and 99.8% at day 14 in P1 and P2, respectively. For Dipylidium caninum and Taeniidae no positive dogs were detected at day 14 in P1. Although drug is off label for the control of Capillaria spp. the Faecal Egg Count Reduction ranging from 42.1% to 84.5% in P1 and P2, respectively. Conclusions Drontal ® Tasty was well-tolerated and safe against major nematodes and cestodes in hunting dogs. It is the optimum choice to treat helminth infection in hunting dogs under field condition. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParasites & VectorsSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207