Demography of lemmings in response to changing snow conditions in the High Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changing snow conditions due to climate warming may negatively affect the northern fauna that depend on it for their winter survival. To avoid cold temperatures, Arctic lemmings seek refuge in areas with deep snowpack where they build nests in which they can reproduce if conditions are favorable. The presence of a soft depth hoar layer ensures efficient digging and facilitates lemming movement in the snow, but such favorable conditions are highly dependent on weather conditions at the beginning of winter. Using a 17-year time series, we assessed the impact of snow conditions and specific weather events on lemming winter reproduction and population growth on Bylot Island in the Canadian High Arctic, a site characterized by a cold and dry Arctic climate. We focused on snow onset date, snow depth, and weather events leading to a hardening of the snow basal layer (i.e., rain-on-snow, melt-freeze, and freezing rain) at the beginning of winter. We also examined possible differences between two lemming species, the brown lemming (Lemmus trimucronatus) and the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus), the latter presenting unique morphological adaptations to snowy environments. We found that the intensity of winter reproduction of both species was negatively related to the intensity of rain-on-snow, melt-freeze, and freezing rain events. Winter population growth was also negatively related to the intensity of rain-on-snow and melt-freeze events in brown lemmings but not in collared lemmings. Contrary to our expectation, no relationship was found between lemming demography and snow onset date or snow depth. We found a higher reproductive rate in collared than in brown lemmings, suggesting a more effective strategy to save energy for winter reproduction in the former species. Overall, this study shows that even moderate weather events, in comparison with other Nordic sites, can impact lemming population growth in winter, likely by reducing their capacity to reproduce due to a hardening of the snowpack. The expected increase in such weather events with climate change may threaten lemming populations even in the High Arctic, as well as predators that depend upon them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".