MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414491537 · doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.005

Transient vision and intraocular pressure changes following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection

2025· article· en· W4414491537 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Khaldon Abbas, Amy Basilious, Julie Duncan, Tom Sheidow, Philip L. Hooper, John R. Gonder

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraocular pressureTransient (computer programming)Eye diseaseGlaucomaElevated intraocular pressureRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess transient intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA) changes following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections and explore factors influencing recovery. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six patients (100 eyes) receiving anti-VEGF injections with either aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab at a retina clinic were included. METHODS: Age, biological sex, diagnosis (neovascular age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema), antiseptic used, anti-VEGF agent, glaucoma status, and IOP-lowering pretreatment were collected. IOP and VA using Snellen charts were measured at baseline, 1, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after injection. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between IOP and VA. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of delayed VA recovery. RESULTS: At 1 minute after intravitreal injection (IVI), VA worsened significantly from a baseline of 0.29 ± 0.21 to 0.76 ± 0.65 logMAR (p < 0.001), while IOP rose from 14.34 ± 4.39 mm Hg to 54.53 ± 20.21 mm Hg (p < 0.001). VA progressively improved over time, with 43% of eyes returning to baseline at 1 minute, 67% at 10 minutes, 83% at 20 minutes, and 89% at 30 minutes. The Spearman correlation coefficient for VA and IOP was statistically significant at 1-minute follow-up after IVI at 0.244 (p = 0.014) but not at later follow-ups. Eyes returning to baseline VA at 1 minute exhibited lower IOP than those not at baseline (p = 0.0004). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors of delayed VA recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Worsened VA and elevated IOP are common in the immediate postinjection period with later improvement. Patients' awareness of VA fluctuations within the first 30 minutes postinjection may aid in the early detection and management of complications associated with IOP elevation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology→Same topicRetinal Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→