MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414491882 · doi:10.1158/2326-6074.cimm25-b019

Abstract B019: CCR5 inhibition with leronlimab is associated with enhanced PD-L1 expression, ICI response, and long-term survival in metastatic TNBC.

2025· article· en· W4414491882 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard G. Pestell, Zhiping Li, Ritika Harish, Xuanmao Jiao, Rui Hallgeir, Massimo Cristofanilli, Daniel L. Adams, Max Lataillade, Neil Buss, Denis R. Burger, Jacob Lalezari

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsAttodyne (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyMetastatic breast cancerClinical trialMetastasisBreast cancerAdverse effectCancerAntibodyBreast cancer metastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: CCR5 is overexpressed in ∼95% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and is associated with resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. CCR5 inhibition reduces graft vs. host disease and tumor metastasis in animal models. Recent clinical observations suggest that combining the CCR5-blocking antibody leronlimab with immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor) (ICI) may significantly improve survival in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). The current studies were conducted to identify the molecular mechanisms by which leronlimab governs PD-L1 expression and ICI responses. Methods: Analysis of patient gene expression, tumor histology, cancer-associated macrophage/circulating tumor cells (CAML/CTC) from the clinical studies, and tissue culture analysis of TNBC were conducted. Findings: Clinical outcomes: In a retrospective post hoc analysis, data were pooled from 28 patients with mTNBC from three clinical trials (NCT03838367 [N=10]; NCT04313075 [N=16]; NCT04504942 [N=2]). Leronlimab was well tolerated, with no patients withdrawing due to leronlimab-related adverse events and no dose-limiting toxicities. Survival outcomes: Of the patients (median age, 48.5 years (32-83; N=28), prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting (median=2), visceral metastases (64% (N=18)), of which (N=8) had brain metastases, and non-visceral metastases (36% (N=10)), ∼18% of heavily pretreated mTNBC patients are currently alive after median >60 months. (1 year survival 35.7%; 2 year survival 21.4%; 3 and 4 year survival 17.9%). Clinical correlates: Higher leronlimab dose (550–700 mg once weekly), induction of PD-L1, and the formation of CCR5 dots in CAML/CTC and treatment with an ICI were associated with improved survival. In large TNBC cohorts (N=1,214), CCR5 expression correlated strongly with ICI-resistance signatures, IFNγ and MHC I/II antigen presentation, and T-cell expansion. CCR5 correlated with ICI resistance in validation cohorts. Cellular effects: CCR5 expression suppressed glycosylated PD-L1; CCR5 inhibition increased total PD-L1 and reduced acidic environment-driven AMPKThr172 activation in TNBC cells. Proteomic findings: CCR5 activity induced sB7H3 ((CD276) member of the immune checkpoint) and sTyro3 (linked to ferroptosis inhibition) and the Tyro3 ligand Pros1. Both CD276 and Tyro3 are associated with ICI resistance, and the abundance of both was attenuated by CCR5 blockade. Conclusions: CCR5 may promote ICI resistance in TNBC by upregulating immune checkpoints (sB7H3) and sTyro3. ∼18% of patients with mTNBC treated with leronlimab in combination, or subsequently, with (ICI are currently alive (median >60 months). Leronlimab is well tolerated and induces PD-L1 expression on CAML/CTC, which may prime tumors for successful PD-L1 blockade. The encouraging long-term survival justifies further evaluation of leronlimab in combination with ICIs. Reference: 369P Pestell, RG., et al., V 10, ESMO Open 2025/5/1 Citation Format: Richard G. Pestell, Zhiping Li, Ritika Harish, Xuanmao Jiao, Rui Hallgeir, Massimo Cristofanilli, Daniel L. Adams, Max Lataillade, Neil E. Buss, Denis R. Burger, Cyrus A. Arman, Jacob P. Lalezari. CCR5 inhibition with leronlimab is associated with enhanced PD-L1 expression, ICI response, and long-term survival in metastatic TNBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207