MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414492041 · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03822-2

Nursing-led strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance: multi-method design

2025· article· en· W4414492041 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Manuel Jesús Pérez‐Baena, Alejandro Torres-Gonçalves, Marina Holgado-Madruga

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndependent Electricity System Operator
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Antibiotic resistanceNursing researchAntimicrobialPopulationPublic healthResistance (ecology)Antibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is currently a global health threat. Numerous efforts have been made to prevent or mitigate this phenomenon, but all have been insufficient. Although numerous studies have postulated nursing as a potential mediator to address this problem, no research has been conducted to put it into practice. This study aims to contextualize the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance, as well as to develop and implement a nurse-led educational intervention aimed at mitigating it, emphasizing the role of nurses in health education. METHODS: Two different groups of participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Nurses administered a survey to 782 citizens in a population from Spain to assess their knowledge of the correct use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance. After completing the survey, nurses explained to the participants how to use antibiotics correctly and the problem of antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, an educational intervention led by nurses was carried out with 104 adolescents, consisting of an oral presentation to raise awareness about the issue. The effectiveness of this intervention was evaluated through a comparative analysis before and after the activity (pre-test and post-test). RESULTS: Our results indicated that the level of knowledge about the correct use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance is not statistically significant related to sex in the general population (p > 0.05). However, it is statistically significant related to age (p < 0.05), educational level (p < 0.0001) and study area (p < 0.0001). In addition, the nurse-led educational intervention increased significantly the level of knowledge on the topic among adolescents (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the low level of knowledge in the population about the correct use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance. It also demonstrates how nurses, through their role in health education, can actively contribute to addressing the issue, providing a rationale for the inclusion of nursing in the design and implementation of strategies to prevent or mitigate antimicrobial resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NursingSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207