MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414492245 · doi:10.3390/nu17193057

Freeze-Dried Donor Milk for Fortification of Mother’s Own Milk in Preterm Infants: A Preliminary Observational Study

2025· article· en· W4414492245 on OpenAlexaff
Niels Rochow, Gisela Adrienne Weiss, Katja Knab, Isabell Prothmann, Stefan Schäfer, Jasper L. Zimmermann, Anastasia Meis, Kerstin Simon, S. Schäfer, Julia Welsch, Christoph Fusch

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrients · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational ageCohort studyCohortLow birth weightBreastfeedingObservational studyBirth weightAnthropometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Freeze-dried high-temperature short-time pasteurized human milk fortifiers offer potential for exclusive human milk feeding in preterm infants while providing necessary nutritional supplementation. However, clinical data on safety, tolerability, and growth outcomes remain limited. This study evaluated donor milk fortification compared to conventional bovine protein-based fortification. Methods: We conducted a prospective non-interventional observational cohort study with a retrospectively matched comparison cohort at University Children’s Hospital of Nuremberg. Preterm infants ≥ 30 weeks gestational age requiring mother’s own milk fortification were included. The exposed cohort (n = 32) received freeze-dried high-temperature short-time pasteurized donor milk fortifier at 1.6–4.8 g/100 mL of mother’s own milk; the matched comparison cohort (n = 32) received bovine protein-based fortifier. Primary outcomes included feeding tolerance, safety parameters, and anthropometric measurements. Cohorts were matched for birth weight (±10%), gestational age (±5 days), and fortified feeding. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different: gestational ages 32.8 ± 1.0 versus 33.0 ± 1.2 weeks; birth weights 1900 ± 380 g versus 1840 ± 370 g. Excellent feeding tolerance was demonstrated across >3100 feedings. No necrotizing enterocolitis, abdominal complications, or serious adverse events occurred. Blood glucose, triglycerides, and urea remained normal. Birth weights, lengths, and head circumferences showed no significant differences. Discharge parameters including weight, length, head circumference, and length of stay were also not significantly different. Conclusions: Freeze-dried human milk fortification demonstrates excellent safety and tolerability in preterm infants ≥ 30 weeks gestational age, achieving anthropometric outcomes not significantly different to bovine protein-based fortification. However, the suboptimal protein-to-energy ratio may limit applicability for very low birth weight infants. Therefore, freeze-dried high-temperature short-time pasteurized human milk fortification is suggested to provide appropriate nutritional supplementation for preterm infants with a birth weight over 1500 g.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrients→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→