MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414492444 · doi:10.1136/thorax-2025-223634

Maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy increases the risk of offspring airway infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4414492444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kareen Alon, Marie Hauerslev, Bo Chawes, Nicklas Brustad

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyOffspringAntibioticsAirwayMEDLINERespiratory tract infectionsRisk assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are widely prescribed during pregnancy, yet their impact on offspring infection risk remains unclear. This study synthesises all available data and evaluates the association between maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy and the risk of infections in offspring during childhood. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, registered with PROSPERO. We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library for English language studies without publication date restrictions. Studies reporting quantitative data on prenatal antibiotic exposure and childhood infections after the neonatal period were included. Two authors screened and extracted data from published reports. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcome was any childhood infection risk, analysed using random-effects meta-analyses with sensitivity analyses by infection type and study quality. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: From 7317 records, 14 cohort studies (n=5 011 183 children) were included, of which 12 (n=4 995 449) provided data for meta-analysis. Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with an increased risk of any offspring infection (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.76, p=0.04). A sensitivity analysis (n=3 647 296) of six high-quality studies showed a stronger association (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.95, p<0.01). Specifically, ear, nose and throat infections were significantly increased (n=2 841 644 children) (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.65, p<0.0001). The risk of bias was low in the majority of the included studies and the certainty of evidence was high for any offspring infection from the GRADE assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with increased offspring infection risk and in particular upper airway infections. These findings indicate a need for cautious antibiotic prescribing during pregnancy, although potential confounding cannot be excluded. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024599699.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207