MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414492857 · doi:10.1158/2326-6074.cimm25-a003

Abstract A003: Identification of immunomodulatory compounds by high-throughput proteomics: Insights from quantification of 1000 proteins in a 20,000 sample screen

2025· article· en· W4414492857 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathaniel Robichaud, Alyssa Rosenbloom, Kiran Edwardson, Narges Rashidi, Milad Dagher

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemProteomicsIdentification (biology)Drug discoveryImmunotherapyQuantitative proteomicsLabel-free quantificationLeverage (statistics)In vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The identification of novel cancer immunotherapies and the characterization of their immunomodulatory effects is complicated by the plasticity of immune cells and the wide range of phenotypes they may adopt. However, the high cost of capturing this diversity at scale limits typical drug discovery efforts to simple readouts, such as cell killing, or the expression of individual cytokines. We previously described the Nomic platform, a proteomics tool capable of quantifying thousands of proteins at high-throughput and low cost. Here, we leverage the Nomic platform to screen a library of bioactive small molecules, characterize their immunomodulatory properties, and assess potential toxicities. We identified both expected and novel immune-regulating compounds, and captured in vitro signs of toxicity from therapies that failed clinical development due to dose-limiting toxicities, highlighting the power of our approach. To achieve this, we collected supernatants from hepatocytes, cardiomyocytes, and microglia treated with 510 compounds at three concentrations. We used Nomic’s Omni 1000 to measure 1,000 proteins across 20,000 samples, generating 20 million data points. Our dataset recapitulated the effects of control compounds such as corticosteroids, which reduced the expression of multiple cytokines while increasing the expression of SAA by hepatocytes, as well as TLR agonists, which dramatically increased the expression of TNFα, IL-12p40, IL-6, and several chemokines. Interestingly, 150 compounds (29%) displayed immunomodulatory properties, many of which were previously unreported. We simultaneously identified potential toxicities of the screened compounds, which was characterized by widespread decreases in protein levels in the supernatant, but increased levels of typically intracellular proteins such as CASP3, GAPDH, IRF3, TYMP, MAPK3, and eIF2a. We identified 68 cytotoxic compounds; of note, while most of these reduced cytokine expression, doxorubicin induced cytokine expression even at non-toxic doses, consistent with its reported pro-inflammatory properties. Other notable exceptions included the GSK-3 inhibitor LY2090314, and the BET inhibitor (+)-JQ1, which were toxic at higher doses, but induced the expression of distinct chemokines at lower doses. Based on the balance of toxicity and immunomodulation, we identified candidates for immunotherapy combinations. For example, the Met inhibitor PF-04217903 potently induced CXCL9-10 and IL-12 expression by hepatocytes, with no signs of toxicity. Considering that PF-04217903 was well tolerated in the clinic but was not pursued for strategic reasons, our results suggest potential for development in combination with checkpoint inhibitors for Met-driven tumors. Our results demonstrate the value of high-throughput proteomics to identify new immunomodulatory compounds and simultaneously characterize their safety profile. Citation Format: Nathaniel Robichaud, Alyssa Rosenbloom, Kiran Edwardson, Narges Rashidi, Milad Dagher. Identification of immunomodulatory compounds by high-throughput proteomics: Insights from quantification of 1000 proteins in a 20,000 sample screen [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207