MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414493870 · doi:10.22323/1.501.0981

Tracing Out The Neutrino Sky With TAMBO

2025· article· en· W4414493870 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C. Argüelles, Pavel Zhelnin, Mauricio Bustamante, Ali Kheirandish, Jeffrey Lazar, J. Bazo, Christopher Briceño, Saneli Carbajal, Víctor Centa, Jaco de Swart, Diyaselis Delgado, T. Dorigo, Anatoli Fedynitch, Pablo Fernández, A. M. Gago, Alfonso Garcia, Alessandro Giuffra, Z. Hampel-Arias, P. Lewis, Daniel Menéndez, Marco Milla, Alberto Peláez, A. Romero‐Wolf, I. Safa, Luciano Stucchi, Jimmy Tarrillo, W. GILMAN THOMPSON, P. Vischia, Aaron C. Vincent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVillum FondenRadcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard UniversityPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSEuropean CommissionFaculty of Arts and SciencesCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchAlfred P. Sloan FoundationAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónHarvard UniversityResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutrinoSkyEvent (particle physics)Identification (biology)Point (geometry)Tracing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional searches for neutrino point sources have been hindered by the look-elsewhere effect. To address this, TAMBO will generate a catalog of neutrino source localizations - each localization equivalent in size to the square of TAMBO’s angular resolution. In doing so, TAMBO will have significantly reduced the available space to be searched by neutrino observatories, thus decreasing the trials factor necessary to elevate a local significance to a global one. In this talk we will present projected sensitivities to various neutrino sources and the effect of a TAMBO event to neutrino source discovery in IceCube. By refining the search through precise source localizations, TAMBO enhances the detection capabilities of observatories like IceCube, paving the way for efficient identification and confirmation of neutrino sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→