MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414510609 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkaf222

A screen for synthetic genetic interactions with the <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae hrq1ΔN</i> allele

2025· article· en· W4414510609 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kennadi A. Shumaker, Michael E. Kumcu, Faith E. McDevitt, Cody M. Rogers, Matthew L. Bochman

Bibliographic record

VenueG3 Genes Genomes Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesIndiana University BloomingtonUniversity of TorontoNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Cancer Society
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHelicaseAlleleGenomeDNASubfamilyPhenocopyGenetic screen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hrq1 helicase is a functional homolog of the disease-linked human RECQL4 enzyme and has been used as a model to study RecQ4 helicase subfamily biology. Although the motor cores of Hrq1 and RECQL4 are quite similar, these proteins display distinct N-terminal domains of unknown function. Do these domains facilitate species-specific activities by the two helicases, or do they serve common roles despite their differences in sequence and predicted structure? We probed these questions here by analyzing an N-terminal domains-truncated isoform of Hrq1 (Hrq1ΔN) both in vitro and in vivo. We found that the Hrq1 N-terminal domains houses a cryptic DNA binding site that is likely important for DNA repair because the hrq1ΔN allele phenocopies the DNA inter-strand crosslink sensitivity of hrq1Δ . Using synthetic genetic array analysis of hrq1ΔN crossed to the yeast S. cerevisiae single-gene deletion and temperature-sensitive allele collections, we also identified hundreds of synthetic genetic interactions, many of which are shared with previously characterized hrq1 mutants. As with similar analyses of hrq1Δ and hrq1-K318A, our results suggest roles for Hrq1 and its N-terminal domains in multiple physiological pathways that underpin genome integrity. Together, these data are guiding our ongoing efforts to understand the roles of Hrq1 and RECQL4 in genome maintenance, which will help to explain why RECQL4 mutations cause disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueG3 Genes Genomes GeneticsSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207