MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414516725 · doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101181

WHO global gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programmes, 2019–22: a retrospective observational study

2025· article· en· W4414516725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersNational Institutes of HealthWorld Health Organization
KeywordsObservational studyAntimicrobialRetrospective cohort studyAntimicrobial stewardshipAntibioticsGonorrheaAntibiotic resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea and gonococcal antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remain global public health concerns, and enhanced quality-assured global surveillance of gonococcal AMR is imperative to inform management guidelines and public health policies. We aimed to describe the results of surveillance of gonococcal AMR conducted globally by WHO and discuss the actions needed to retain our ability to treat gonorrhoea. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we present gonococcal AMR data reported to WHO by 77 countries between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 31, 2022. Gonococcal isolates were tested for minimum inhibitory concentrations of one to four key antimicrobials (ceftriaxone, cefixime, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin) in each country. We used breakpoints for resistance and decreased susceptibility to antimicrobials from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing or Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute. FINDINGS: 29 (39%) of 75 participating countries reported at least one isolate with resistance or decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone, 28 (50%) of 56 reported resistance or decreased susceptibility to cefixime, 58 (88%) of 66 reported resistance to azithromycin, and 74 (99%) of 75 reported resistance to ciprofloxacin. Globally, azithromycin resistance is increasing, as is resistance or decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime, especially in the WHO Western Pacific region. Resistance to ciprofloxacin remained very high globally. Since 2017-18, the numbers of reporting countries, examined isolates, and resistant isolates have increased. However, surveillance levels remain inadequate in central America and the Caribbean, eastern Europe, and the WHO African, Eastern Mediterranean, and South-East Asia regions. INTERPRETATION: Global AMR surveillance conducted by WHO is expanding and, in selected countries, improving through standardisation and quality assurance, as well as implementation of extragenital sampling, test of cure, and whole-genome sequencing. This approach provides evidence-based data for management guidelines and public health policies. Improvements in prevention, early diagnosis, treatment of patients and their contacts, surveillance (of infection rates, AMR, treatment failures, and antimicrobial use), and antimicrobial stewardship are essential. WHO supports this work through several global action plans on AMR, new global gonorrhoea treatment recommendations, surveillance, and research. FUNDING: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it