MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seismic resilience-based assessment and design of concrete bridge piers reinforced with shape memory alloy bars

2025· article· en· W4414522540 on OpenAlexafffund
Lianxu Zhou, Aijun Ye, M. Shahria Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPierSeismic analysisSMA*Incremental Dynamic AnalysisPlastic hingeShape-memory alloySeismic hazardBridge (graph theory)Seismic retrofit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the shape memory alloy (SMA) bar to reinforce a bridge pier is considered a viable solution for improving its seismic resilience. Up to now, engineering and academic communities still lack knowledge on designing bridge piers from a seismic resilience-based perspective with quantifiable and controllable earthquake-induced disturbance. This study proposes and implements a resilience-based seismic design method for concrete bridge piers or columns reinforced with SMA bars to address this issue. Such a methodology utilizes an equivalent downtime to quantify seismic resilience and incorporates an authentic and quantifiable bridge post-earthquake recovery process into the pre-disaster evaluation and design processes. After that, this methodology is implemented through a benchmark bridge pier. A numerical model of the pier, reinforced with varying SMA replacement ratios in its plastic region, is generated considering the longitudinal rebars’ bond slip and material-related parameter uncertainty. Site-specific ground motion records are chosen based on a uniform hazard spectrum for seismic excitations. The seismic fragility and resilience surfaces of the bridge pier are generated (using residual and peak drift ratios as dual damage indicators) to reveal the influence of the SMA replacement ratio. Finally, an optimal SMA replacement ratio is ascertained based on seismic resilience objectives. The result indicates that partially rather than fully replacing the ordinary longitudinal rebars using SMA bars in the plastic hinge region of concrete bridge piers is adequate to satisfy seismic resilience requirements, achieving a balance between the bridge’s seismic resilience and its initial construction costs. • A resilience-based seismic design methodology is proposed and implemented in this study. • An authentic bridge post-earthquake recovery process is incorporated into seismic resilience assessment and design. • An equivalent downtime index is utilized to quantify the earthquake-induced disturbance. • Partially replacing ordinary rebars using SMA bars is adequate to satisfy seismic resilience requirements for bridge piers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering StructuresSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207