MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414523192 · doi:10.1007/s10344-025-01971-y

Modelling population dynamics of woodland caribou in Ontario and Quebec, Canada, using the logistic equation with uncertainty analysis

2025· article· en· W4414523192 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rebecca Viejou, Guy R. Larocque, Arthur Rodgers, Frederick W. Bell, Tom Schiks

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsOntario Forest Research InstituteMinistry of Energy, Northern Development and MinesMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsPopulationWoodlandPopulation modelCarrying capacityWoodland caribouVital ratesPopulation growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to introduce the model CARIBOUMOD, which simulates the dynamics of woodland caribou ( Rangifer tarandus caribou ) populations in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. The model, based on the Verhulst-Pearl population dynamics equation, relies on input population parameters commonly collected across many woodland caribou populations in Canada (e.g., calf-female ratios, proportion of females and mortality rates) and has the option to account for variability in population parameters using a Monte Carlo algorithm. Population projections over 50 years were performed for 18 woodland caribou populations in Ontario and Quebec. The most recently published demographic data were used to initialize input parameters of the model. Three different carrying capacity levels were tested to demonstrate the sensitivity of the model to the density-dependent term. If the recruitment and mortality rates were to remain similar over time, 15 of the 18 populations would be expected to decline, one would remain stable, and two would increase. For 13 populations, carrying capacity had a negligible effect on simulated population dynamics. However, carrying capacity had a non-negligible effect on the rate of increase for the two increasing populations, and on the rate of decline for the three populations where initial population densities were more than 20% of the lowest carrying capacity level tested. The population dynamics model can be used to simulate long-term patterns of population development based on current knowledge and determine whether population dynamics can be predicted using data from current population monitoring protocols. For some local populations, additional surveys of demographic data are desirable to better characterize the long-term population trajectories. The ability to simulate populations using alternative input parameters, including recruitment, mortality and extraction (harvest) rates, was integrated in the developed software (CARIBOUMOD), allowing it to facilitate the analysis of the effects of management scenarios and the development of conservation policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Wildlife ResearchSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207