MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414523419 · doi:10.1192/bjp.2025.10375

The relationship between placement instability and mental health among care-experienced children and young people: UK systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4414523419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cody Varnish, Alice Phillips, S Laxman, Nina Maxwell, Sarah L. Halligan, Katherine S. Button

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Bath
KeywordsMental healthFace (sociological concept)Mental illnessMental health lawSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Children in care who experience frequent placement changes face an increased risk of negative mental health outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship, where placement instability can both predict and result from mental health difficulties. Understanding the strength and direction of this relationship is crucial for informing policy and practice, yet UK-based evidence remains unconsolidated. AIMS: To conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between placement instability and mental health in the UK care system. METHOD: This review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024493617). We searched five databases (up to August 2024) for peer-reviewed UK studies that included a care-experienced sample, measured placement (in)stability, measured mental health, and quantitatively examined the relationship between placement instability and mental health. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: = 5536) contributing to the meta-analysis. Children with unstable placements were more than twice as likely to experience mental health difficulties compared to those with stable placements (odds ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.65-2.59). However, evidence on the causal direction of this relationship was limited. CONCLUSION: Placement instability doubles the risk of mental health difficulties for care-experienced children, who already face elevated rates of mental disorders. Further research is urgently needed to clarify the bidirectional nature of this relationship and guide targeted intervention. Meanwhile, policymakers should prioritise collaborations between mental health services and local authorities to prevent the cycle of instability and mental health deterioration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.036
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of PsychiatrySame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207