MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414525128 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1594317

Genome-wide association study of chlamydia reinfection in African American women

2025· article· en· W4414525128 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Patki, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra, Sandeep C Vejandla, Archish Sadeesh, Kanupriya Gupta, Mary Appah, William M. Geisler

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
KeywordsChlamydiaAfrican americanAssociation (psychology)Genome-wide association studyImmune systemGenetic association

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is a bacterium that causes chlamydia, the most diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the world. In the U.S., chlamydia is most prevalent among non-Hispanic African American (AA) individuals, implying substantial racial disparity. Despite prevention and control efforts, reinfection is common, suggesting that some individuals have insufficient protective immunity to Ct. To better understand the genetically mediated risks of chlamydia reinfection, we sought to identify genetic loci associated with reinfection using a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) approach. Method We performed GWAS in 300 AA women with versus without chlamydia reinfection based on Ct testing done about 3 months after chlamydia treatment. We conducted logistic regression models to test the additive genetic effect and used Firth regression to confirm the association results. Furthermore, we performed post-GWAS analysis to determine the functional consequences of GWAS hits, including fine-mapping, expression quantitative loci (eQTL) and chromatin interaction analyses, tissue and cell-type expression, and pathway analysis. Results GWAS identified 17 suggestive genomic regions of interest. Five genomic regions out of 17 were identified as strongly associated with reinfection, using linkage disequilibrium and fine mapping. The positional mapping, eQTL, and chromatin interactions (CIs) analyses further identified 12 gene targets. Among the 12 gene targets, CHIT1, ADORA1, and CHI3L1 in chromosome 1 (chr. 1); TDRP, FBXO25, and SULF1 in chr. 8; and the SOCS6 gene in chr. 18, were functionally relevant to reinfection. Conclusions This GWAS study in AA women identified multiple novel genes associated with chlamydia reinfection, including CHIT1, CHI3L1, ADORA1, ALK, TDRP, FBXO25, LINC01592, SULF1, and SOCS6, which are involved in the immune response. CHIT1, ADORA1, CHI3L1, TDRP, FBOXO25, SULF1, and SOCS6 were identified using CI/eQTL mapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207