Parents' information needs and their recommendations for effective sexuality education to children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: As children undergo significant developmental transitions, comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) becomes essential. Despite global evidence supporting early CSE, many parents feel underprepared to address topics such as puberty, consent, gender identity, and digital safety with their children. This study explores parents' information needs, barriers, and recommendations for effective sexuality education tools. Methods: A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach guided six focus group discussions (FGDs) with 30 diverse Canadian parents of children aged 0-18 years, conducted between January 2023 and March 2023. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's inductive approach. Themes were validated through member checking and dual independent coding using NVivo. Results: Three major themes emerged from the data. First, parents expressed strong need for sexual health education support, including a desire for age-appropriate, inclusive, and culturally relevant resources, along with improved access to trustworthy information. Many felt underprepared to initiate conversations and called for clear guidance tailored to children's developmental stages. Second, parents prioritized a range of core content areas, such as puberty, hygiene, consent, healthy relationships, gender identity, and digital safety and highlighted the emotional and practical challenges of addressing these topics confidently. Third, parents recommended diverse, user-friendly formats for delivering sexual health education, including short digital videos, searchable websites, visual tools like charts and infographics, storybooks, multilingual materials, and structured workshops for both parents and children. Across all groups, there was a shared call for practical tools that are timely, culturally attuned, and capable of supporting value-aligned, ongoing conversations in the home. Conclusion: Canadian parents face different barriers to delivering effective sexuality education, shaped by cultural norms, informational gaps, and discomfort with sensitive topics. To empower parents as primary educators, there is a critical need for co-designed, accessible, and culturally inclusive resources that reflect diverse parenting contexts. Future efforts should explore how policy-level interventions particularly within education systems can support these collaborative efforts among families, schools, and healthcare providers to promote informed, age-appropriate, and inclusive sexual development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".